2025 Midyear Market Outlook
Investing in a post-globalisation world
Trade policy upheaval has put deglobalisation and market shifts into overdrive. Our investment experts delve into understanding the emerging risks—and opportunities—for investors in the second half of 2025.
Investing in a post-globalisation world
Eric Veiel, CFA®
Head of Global Investments and Chief Investment Officer
The year 2025 was always going to be one of change, but the speed and extent of developments have taken almost everybody by surprise. The full impact of trade policy shifts have yet to unfold, but it is clear that the global trading system is being reconfigured before our eyes, with profound implications for financial markets.
We are undergoing a process of deglobalization. This will negatively impact the global economy, with the key protagonists, the U.S. and China, hit hardest. It is also a key factor in our outlook for equity, fixed income, and asset allocation investing through the rest of 2025.
The threat of tariffs has brought forward changes in equity markets that had already begun to occur prior to November’s U.S. presidential election. The spread of earnings growth between the “Magnificent Seven” group of mega‑cap tech stocks and the rest of the U.S. stock market will likely continue to diminish, fueling a period of less concentrated markets and more varied market leadership. We expect this broadening of the opportunity set to include non‑U.S. stocks as well.
In bond markets, massive German fiscal expansion, in combination with the U.S. tariff policies, has triggered a global regime change. Higher‑trend inflation—most notably in the U.S.—and a heightened risk of a sharp growth slowdown are pushing developed market sovereign bond yields higher, eroding the quality of developed market sovereign bonds. However, corporate bonds are heading into the difficult period ahead with meaningfully higher overall credit quality than in the past.
The market environment has led our Asset Allocation Committee to favor inflation protected bonds and real assets, such as real estate and commodities, to offset inflation risk. Given the likelihood of continued geopolitical volatility, we are focusing heavily on valuations and continue to favor value stocks over growth stocks. We also modestly favor non‑U.S. stocks.
Volatility is elevated, and policy is changeable. We are ready to respond as clarity over tariffs emerges over the coming months. The most important thing is to acknowledge that in the less globalized world ahead, the range and mix of investment opportunities will be different from those to which we have been accustomed. Successfully adjusting to this new reality will demand heightened vigilance, a willingness to let go of old assumptions, and an ability to take decisive action when required.
“Expectations at start of 2025” are from our 2025 Global Market Outlook, issued in November 2024. The Scorecard does not reflect all views and expectations covered in that report. “How we did” reflects what we got right and wrong as of the time of this writing. The orange dash indicates we were partially right. Future outcomes may differ materially and the information provided is subject to change.
Midyear Economic Outlook: Trump's tariffs will hit the U.S. economy hardest in the near term
Blerina Uruçi, Chief U.S. Economist
Tomasz Wieladek, Chief European Economist
Chris Kushlis, Chief Emerging Markets Macro Strategist
The Trump administration’s tariffs—combined with any retaliatory measures from U.S. trading partners—will, if implemented, deliver a supply shock to the U.S. and a demand shock for the rest of the world. The severity of these shocks will depend on the outcome of ongoing trade negotiations and legal challenges. However, it seems certain that the world’s two largest economies, China and the U.S., will experience lower economic growth than projected at the beginning of the year—and the ramifications of this will be felt across the globe irrespective of any individual trade deals struck.
The U.S. faces downside risks to the growth outlook even as higher reciprocal tariffs with China and other trading partners have been paused. Businesses face rising input costs, which would squeeze profit margins and force some firms to reduce investment spending. Tariffs on consumer goods will likely reduce real purchasing power and slow consumer spending, which accounts for more than 70% of U.S. gross domestic product. Any further downward pressure on the U.S. dollar could exacerbate upside risks to inflation.
The U.S. labor market has remained resilient so far, but recent data confirm that it has transitioned from exceptionally tight in 2022–2023 to more balanced now. This implies a thinner cushion for the labor market than at any point in the post‑pandemic period. In the event of a large and persistent shock to economic activity, a pickup in the pace of layoffs would push up the unemployment rate.
The U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) is in a difficult position as it balances the risk of tariff‑fueled inflation with supporting a weakening economy. This tension will likely linger through 2025. President Donald Trump has been leaning heavily on the Fed to cut rates, but the Fed’s independence remains intact for now. For the remainder of the year, we expect the focus to be on deregulation and fiscal measures such as tax cuts, which could deliver a boost for U.S. growth. We will monitor these developments closely as they would pose upside risks to both the growth and inflation outlooks.
China’s more focused trade war gives it more options
As the main target for U.S. tariffs, China also faces economic headwinds in the second half of the year, albeit different in nature and probably less severe than those the U.S. faces. Although negotiations between the two countries have resulted in lower tariffs, those currently in place will still have a major impact on U.S.‑China trade.
One advantage China has is that while the U.S. is busy fighting a trade war with almost every country in the world, it is only fighting one against the U.S. As such, China will likely seek to reship many of its goods through other countries with lower tariffs. If this happens at scale, it will mitigate the growth and deflationary pressures China faces, although it may not be enough to prevent a growth slowdown. We expect Beijing to use a combination of monetary and fiscal stimulus to offset the drag on growth from tariffs, but any such measures will be taken sequentially and in response to data rather than being rolled out all at once.
No region unaffected by battle of the heavyweights
Despite being lowered from the levels previously threatened, the U.S.’s tariffs on China will still impact the eurozone in several ways: First, because weaker growth will reduce China’s demand for European exports; second, because Chinese manufacturers seeking to redirect their exports away from the U.S. will provide more intense competition for European exporters in other markets; and third, because a surge of Chinese imports will contribute to goods disinflation within the eurozone itself.
Combined with the direct impact of the eurozone’s own trade tensions with the U.S., these secondary impacts from China will likely contribute to slowing growth in Europe in the second half of the year. Inflation should continue to decline in the near term, and while Germany’s debt brake reform will eventually provide a boost to the eurozone economy, this may take some time to materialize. Negotiated wage growth in the eurozone is expected to continue falling, giving the European Central Bank further latitude to cut rates—and we expect it to do so several times before inflation risks rise again in 2026.
Deflationary pressure in China is also likely to spill over into other emerging markets (EMs) as Chinese goods are redirected to other countries in the region, lowering prices. Weaker global growth and lower commodity prices may bring further disinflationary pressures in EMs, with commodity producers likely to remain under pressure. Given the uncertainty, most EM central banks will be cautious and wait for the data to tell them what to do next—although the weaker U.S. dollar will give some of them more room to cut rates without risking a currency sell‑off or inflation spike.
Global economy buffeted from multiple directions
(Fig. 1) Fiscal reform and deregulation could partially offset tariff impact
As of May 31, 2025.
For illustrative purposes only. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from forward-looking statements.
Source: T. Rowe Price.
Key takeaway
The world’s two largest economies will be most affected by tariffs, with inevitable consequences for all other regions.
Midyear Equity Outlook: Summary with Portfolio Specialist, Jennifer O'Hara Martin
In this video, Jennifer O'Hara Martin, Portfolio Specialist in Global Equity, explains how the expansion of equity markets, driven by the new administration’s trade and national security policies, is significantly impacting capital flows.
Transcript
The broadening of equity markets - accelerated by the new administration’s policies on trade and national security - is significantly influencing capital flows. These changes are prompting investors to seek global diversification and favor active management strategies. As a result, this evolving landscape presents expanded opportunities across all markets.
U.S. stocks have underperformed international markets – marking a notable shift after years of U.S. stock market dominance.
In the developed world, European stocks are outperforming their U.S. counterparts, benefiting from lower valuations and potential advantages from central bank rate cuts and increased government spending. Meanwhile, Japan's strong fundamentals and undervalued stocks offer promising prospects.
In emerging markets, opportunities may arise from select countries such as India, Argentina, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia. Each of these countries is leveraging reforms, demographic advantages, and sectoral growth to offer compelling opportunities for global investors.
By sector, in a higher inflation environment, value stocks in energy, materials, and industrials, even financials may be poised for a comeback.
As leadership in equity markets evolves, investment opportunities are expanding across the globe. In this dynamic environment, maintaining a diversified approach and focusing on identifying high-quality companies are essential for capturing growth and managing risk.
Equity markets to broaden further
Josh Nelson, Head of Global Equity
Scott Berg, Portfolio Manager, Global Equity
An expanding opportunity set in stock markets was on its way before Donald Trump was elected U.S. president; the trade policies he has implemented since taking up office have merely sped up the process. This expansion of investable stocks will take place both within the U.S. market and abroad. We are returning to an environment in which more sectors and regions can work—one demanding diversification and favoring active management.
Broadening market leadership has already begun to occur: Many overseas stock markets have outperformed their U.S. counterparts this year. This expansion of leadership should continue in the second half of the year. Although the Trump administration’s tax cut and deregulation agenda will deliver a boost to the U.S. economy, this will likely be balanced out in the near term by ongoing uncertainty over tariffs and their impact on U.S. consumers and businesses.
At the same time, the era in which the “Magnificent Seven” group of mega‑cap tech stocks dominated the S&P 500, and by extension helped U.S. stocks to dominate the world, could be transitioning to a new phase where a broader cross‑section of stocks outperform. The spread of earnings growth between technology stocks and the rest of the S&P 500 has been narrowing, and we expect this to continue (Figure 2). The emergence of start‑ups such as China’s DeepSeek are showing that AI innovation is no longer concentrated in a handful of trillion‑dollar companies.
As U.S. inflation remains higher for longer, value stocks—which historically have outperformed growth stocks in inflationary environments—are expected to become more competitive again. Value sectors such as energy, materials, and industrials historically have performed well during inflationary periods.
India and Argentina stand out among emerging markets
Opportunities for regional diversification are likely to come mainly in EM countries. Of these, India looks well positioned after two terms under Prime Minister Narendra Modi have delivered solid economic growth, reforms, and investment. With its large, domestically driven economy, India is more insulated from tariff‑related volatility than many of its rivals and has sufficient critical mass—measured in economic scale, infrastructure, digital adoption, and the expansion of the middle class—to continue its growth path. While Indian stock valuations remain elevated, the market’s resilience and strong economic fundamentals should not be underestimated if buying opportunities occur.
Argentina continues to catch the eye amid ongoing reforms under President Javier Milei. His administration’s efforts to balance the budget and control inflation have helped to transform Argentina’s economic prospects, which have been further boosted by a USD 20 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund. The risk premium associated with Argentine stocks means they remain attractively valued, offering discounts compared with some of their regional peers.
Indonesian and Saudi Arabian stocks are also expected to perform well as part of a broader tilt toward international equities. However, some other countries, notably Vietnam, face a somewhat more challenging period ahead as they navigate U.S.‑China tensions.
Tech stock dominance is fading
(Fig. 2) The spread of earnings growth between tech and other sectors is narrowing
As of December 31, 2024.
Sources: Standard and Poor’s, Refinitiv, FactSet, UBS. See Additional Disclosures.
1 TECH+ is the Technology Sector including Interactive Media & Services, Interactive Home Entertainment, Netflix from Movies & Entertainment and Amazon.
E = Estimates. Actual outcomes may differ materially from estimates.
European stocks are attractively valued
Outside of emerging markets, European stocks have outperformed U.S. stocks this year and appear well placed to continue doing so. European equities are trading at lower price‑to‑earnings ratios than their U.S. counterparts and are more likely to benefit from a central bank rate cut. Germany’s decision to end its longstanding debt brake will enable increased investment and defense spending, while the prospect of reduced trade with the U.S. might persuade the European Union to introduce much‑needed reforms.
Josh Nelson, Head of Global Equity
One area to monitor is the fluid situation with tariffs, as shown in the U.S.’s decision on May 23 to impose a 50% rate on European Union goods only to postpone it a few days later. The size, scope, and speed of tariff implementation could bring further volatility for both U.S. and European stocks.
Finally, while Japan has been hit harder than Europe by Trump’s tariffs given its greater dependence on exports to the U.S., Japanese stocks appear undervalued compared with historical norms and global peers. Japan’s strong underlying fundamentals—including a robust corporate sector, high savings rates, ongoing corporate governance reforms, and the return of positive inflation—remain in place and will be supportive, particularly if it strikes a favorable trade deal with the U.S.
As equity market leadership becomes less concentrated, the mix of opportunities will likely broaden across sectors and countries. Successfully navigating this environment will require diversification1 and a renewed focus on identifying high‑quality companies. A broader market provides more opportunities, but it also brings additional risk.
Key takeaway
The broadening of equity market leadership should favor value stocks and select emerging markets such as India and Argentina.
Midyear Fixed Income Outlook: Summary with Head of Global High Yield and CIO, Paul Massaro
Paul Massaro, CFA®, Head of Global High Yield and Chief Investment Officer, emphasises that the two key factors driving global bond markets this year are the United States' tariff actions and the significant German fiscal expansion.
Transcript
Two of the major drivers of global bond markets this year have been the United States tariff actions and the significant German fiscal expansion. These factors signal a weaker outlook for developed market sovereign bonds, but the environment could offer opportunity in credit and select emerging market bonds.
Above-target inflation is becoming a persistent issue in developed markets, especially in the U.S. While the Federal Reserve is essentially on hold at the moment due to concerns around inflation, slowing growth and the uncertainty of tariff policy actions, other developed market central banks may still lower rates.
Despite the challenging longer-term outlook for higher-quality global sovereigns and expectations for higher rate volatility in the U.S., given the fiscal situation, corporate bonds are entering this more volatile period with improved credit quality. For example, the ratings quality composition of thebsub-investment grade bond market is much improved in recent years and it is a relatively short duration asset class. High yield bonds, select emerging market bonds, and shorter maturity bonds overall may offer meaningful diversification in this environment. Bonds from Latin America and Eastern Europe, for example, which are less exposed to tariffs, may present attractive opportunities for yield and stability.
As the global fixed income landscape evolves and policy uncertainty persists, strategic diversification among fixed income assets could be key to navigating these changes.
Bonds with credit risk may outperform government debt
Paul Massaro, CFA®
Kenneth A. Orchard, CFA®
Already this year, two events have occurred that have broken historical precedent and shifted the global fixed income landscape. The massive German fiscal expansion and the Trump administration’s tariffs have resulted in a weaker outlook for developed market sovereign bonds and a stronger one for credit and some emerging markets. More recently, rising anxiety over the U.S.’s fiscal position led to a sell‑off in U.S. Treasuries.
The combination of recent events has triggered a global regime change. One of the most conspicuous symptoms of this is that above‑target inflation in some developed markets looks here to stay. The inflation outlook is particularly downbeat for the U.S., where we expect the tariff‑induced supply shock to produce a material bump higher in prices despite lower oil prices offsetting some of the upward pressure in the short term. With inflation currently running at an elevated 2.5%–3.0%, it is difficult to see it reaching the Federal Reserve’s 2% target over the next few years.
The likelihood of a global recession—with the U.S. leading the downturn—has also increased. Even if President Trump lowers tariffs from their current levels or abandons them entirely, there will be lingering damage as the uncertainty of the on‑again, off‑again trade levies at varying levels has damaged corporate and consumer confidence. Instead of a traditional recession, what may transpire—especially in the U.S.—is a longer period of subpar growth with both higher unemployment and higher inflation.
Bond markets at a glance
(Fig. 3) Six key data points
| 4.40% | 10 Year U.S. Treasury yield as of May 31, 20251 |
|---|---|
| Euro 500M | Fiscal expansion announced by Germany on March 4, 2025 |
| 6.2% | U.S. budget deficit forecast as percent of GDP for fiscal year 20252 |
| 2.50% | 10 Year German Bund yield as of May 31, 20251 |
| 5% | U.S. high yield approximate default rate estimated prior to April tariff announcements |
| 7.73% | Yield to worst of the U.S. high yield market3 |
Higher inflation to keep Fed on hold despite slowing growth
The mix of structurally higher inflation and the higher probability of a steep downturn in growth means that the Fed’s monetary policy is essentially on hold for the time being. Outside the U.S., where inflationary pressure is somewhat lower, other developed market central banks have more room to lower rates.
In the short term, we expect continued volatility as fixed income markets work through the implications of regime change. Over the longer term, European growth, driven by Germany’s aggressive fiscal expansion, should recover relatively quickly. Global inflation is likely to push higher amid supply problems stemming from the trade war. We expect to see higher yields as investors anticipate the erosion of developed market sovereign bond values by inflation.
Improved overall quality to bolster corporate credit
This outlook does not bode well for high‑quality global sovereigns over the long term. However, the picture is a little different for fixed income sectors with credit risk. As of late May, credit spreads1 have narrowed to near‑record lows after the sell‑off in April’s turbulence, so they could certainly widen further in the near term. However, corporate bond markets—both investment grade and high yield—are going into this economic downturn with meaningfully higher overall credit quality than in the past.
One‑third of the non‑investment‑grade bond market is secured,2 or backed by collateral that goes to the bondholder in the event of default. In another indication of higher credit quality and recession resistance, the amount of non‑energy cyclical sector exposure in the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield 2% Issuer Cap Index was about eight percentage points lower as of March 31, 2025, than 10 years earlier. From a broader point of view, the average credit rating of the non‑investment‑grade index was higher as of the end of March than it was 10 years ago.
That said, some of the weaker high yield issuers in sectors dependent on consumer spending could default as tariffs slash their profit margins. Prior to the early April tariff announcements, our high yield credit analyst team anticipated a 2025 U.S. default rate of about 5%.3 We now think it could drift higher but doubt that it will reach the 7%–8% level experienced following the onset of the pandemic in 2020.
High yield and select emerging market bonds offer meaningful diversification
Shorter‑maturity investment‑grade corporate bonds should hold up better than longer‑maturity corporates in an environment of increasing long‑term government yields. In the high yield market, shorter‑maturity bonds with early refinancings ahead of maturity dates are also potentially attractive.
Within the non‑investment‑grade market, we modestly favor bonds over bank loans because loans are generally trading at higher prices currently, giving them less price appreciation potential. Also, loans—which have floating rate coupons that adjust in lockstep with short‑term interest rates—are exposed to spreads widening in a recession at the same time that coupons are dropping if the Fed is forced to cut rates.
In international markets, bonds from emerging markets that are less exposed to the tariff war—particularly those in Latin America and Eastern Europe—could hold up surprisingly well, providing attractive opportunities for yield and diversification. Another advantage of emerging market exposure is that some higher‑quality emerging market sovereigns have been less volatile than developed market government bonds, including U.S. Treasuries.
Key takeaway
Corporate bonds are entering a likely economic downturn with historically high credit quality, positioning them more defensively than in the past.
Midyear Asset Allocation: Summary with Head of Global Multi-Asset and CIO, Sébastien Page
Sébastien Page CFA®, Head of Global Multi-Asset and Chief Investment Officer, discusses the risk of surprises on inflation and how attractive valuations may lead us to favour international and value equities when determining portfolio allocations.
Transcript
Ok. To state the obvious, tariffs have dominated the headlines over the last few months, and they’re driving the stock market. The stock market is following tariff headlines.But there’s more to it. A large proportion of GDP is not impacted by tariffs on goods imports. For example, in the U.S., 70% of GDP is services consumption.
So, across our research platform and in our Asset Allocation Committee, the bulls and the bears are talking about a lot more than just tariffs. We’re debating the following:The bulls are saying, “Ok, earnings are growing at a steady clip, the Fed wants to cut, and the U.S. consumer remains strong.”
What are the bears saying? “Well, valuations are pretty high, growth is slowing, and policy risk remains very high.”
Importantly, on our Asset Allocation Committee, we’re discussing the risk of surprises on inflation. We think this could be a key risk, for at least four reasons: One, commodities prices bear watching. Second, wages are growing at 4%, hardly consistent with 2% inflation.Third, there is a housing shortage in the U.S.And fourth, of course, tariffs can be inflationary.
So, overall, our Asset Allocation Committee strategy focuses on the interplay between economic and geopolitical dynamics. Our Asset Allocation Committee is positioned for three things:Number one, a continued market broadening. We have long positions in value and international stocks. Number two, resilience to positive and negative tail events, and Number three, inflation risk and possible Treasuries underperformance.
Look, we’re at a critical time in capital markets history. Now is not the time to panic. And by the way, it never is the time to panic! Markets can surprise us on the downside and on the upside. So diversification is important more than ever and it happens to be cheap because diversifying assets currently trade at a lower valuation. So that is our strategy. Thank you.
Inflation protection and equity diversification to drive asset allocation
Timothy C. Murray, CFA®
While we anticipated a deglobalization process following the pandemic‑induced supply chain snarls in 2020, the threat of tariffs has brought globalization under attack. Countries and companies are scrambling to reduce their exposure to tariffs, greatly accelerating the deglobalization trend. This process will have significant implications for asset allocation as some previously favored assets become less attractive and others show more potential.
One thing is clear—the Federal Reserve will stick to its data‑dependent approach, avoiding forward guidance, and continue to assiduously avoid any messaging that could be interpreted as political. Fed policymakers know that lower rates are not a cure for uncertainty, so we do not expect a “Fed put” in the form of an interest rate cut over the near term. We see little chance that the central bank will lower rates until a major increase in the unemployment rate shows that a recession is obviously imminent.
The Fed is also reluctant to cut rates because of the risk that tariffs will pressure inflation higher. We are mindful of this possibility and favor exposure to inflation protected bonds and real assets like real estate and commodities as tools to help offset inflation risk. Our Asset Allocation Committee (AAC) holds an underweight position in longer‑term U.S. Treasuries as they could underperform amid resurgent inflation. Additionally, Treasuries face growing scrutiny from foreign investors due to concerns about fiscal sustainability and economic policy uncertainty.
Growth stock valuations remain elevated
In times of rapid geopolitical change, we tend to lean more heavily than usual on asset class valuations. Even after the concentrated selling pressure on growth stocks and value’s relative outperformance in early 2025, value equities appear to provide more valuation support than growth.
In artificial intelligence, the tremendous advantages of being on the right side of change, as illustrated during the shifts toward digital media, online retail, and cloud computing, appear to have flattened out. As a result, the tech giants are spending heavily on AI to try to ensure they maintain their positions on the leading edge of technology. We believe this spending will be profitable over the longer term, but time horizon is important. These innovative firms could see their valuations challenged over the near term by flattening returns on equity while their capital expenditures are elevated (Figure 4).
Capex is beginning to weigh on mega‑cap tech cash flow
(Fig. 4) Capex vs. free cash flow for Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta, collectively
As of March 31, 2025. Q1 2017 to Q1 2025. Q2 2025 to Q4 2026 are estimates for Capex and Free Cash Flow.
The specific securities identified and described are for informational purposes only and do not represent recommendations.
Source: T. Rowe Price analysis using data from FactSet Research Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Please see Additional Disclosures page for additional legal notices and disclaimers.
These data are for illustrative purposes only, representing 4 mega‑cap tech companies collectively. They do not represent all mega‑cap tech companies. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from estimates. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
Capex = Capital Expenditures.
Trade war to dampen traditional U.S. equity advantage in a downturn
In a typical economic growth downturn or recession, we would expect U.S. equities to hold up better than international stocks. But we believe the underlying dynamics of this year’s slump may be different, leading us to modestly favor non‑U.S. shares.
One factor working against U.S. equities is the inflationary pressure from tariffs that will keep the Fed on hold unless a recession is inevitable. Outside the U.S. (and Japan, where the Bank of Japan has been gradually raising rates), central banks have more leeway to lower rates—and mortgage rates are more responsive to cuts, so the benefits flow through the economy faster.
Finally, the recent landmark decision by Germany to loosen its debt brake on defense spending and create a EUR 500 billion infrastructure fund is a dramatic change after more than a decade of austerity measures. This pivot could eventually provide a much‑needed fiscal boost to the European economy, which has been operating below capacity for most of the past 15 years, supporting the Continent’s equity markets.
All of these factors, combined with the sizable weighting of the mega‑cap tech firms in growth stock indexes, led the AAC to a relative underweight to U.S. growth equities.
Corporate governance reforms continue to support Japanese equities
Japan still stands out among international equity markets because of its positive momentum toward stronger corporate governance. The country’s steady progress toward a healthy level of inflation and domestic consumption should also support its stock market. While exports are a major driver of Japan’s economy, making it particularly sensitive to U.S. tariffs, Japan appears motivated to negotiate with the Trump administration to lower tariffs.
Key takeaway
Our Asset Allocation Committee holds underweight positions in both long-term U.S. Treasuries and U.S. stocks.
Sign up to receive our monthly Global Asset Allocation Viewpoints from our Investment Committee
Each month, our Investment Committee prepare a report revealing the two market themes they are watching, their bull and bear views per region and their latest asset class over and underweights.It has been designed to aid you in your decision making and client conversations.
1 Credit spreads measure the additional yield that investors demand for holding a bond with credit risk over a similar‑maturity, high‑quality government security.
2 Source: J.P. Morgan.
3 Default estimate includes both traditional defaults and distressed exchanges. If a distressed exchange is deemed likely for an issuer, we consider all the securities of that issuer within the index to be in default. Actual outcomes may differ materially from estimates.
Appendix
Investment Risks:
Active investing may have higher costs than passive investing and may underperform the broad market or passive peers with similar objectives. Each persons investing situation and circumstances differ. Investors should take all considerations into account before investing.
International investments can be riskier than U.S. investments due to the adverse effects of currency exchange rates, differences in market structure and liquidity, as well as specific country, regional, and economic developments. The risks of international investing are heightened for investments in emerging market and frontier market countries. Emerging and frontier market countries tend to have economic structures that are less diverse and mature, and political systems that are less stable, than those of developed market countries.
Commodities are subject to increased risks such as higher price volatility, geopolitical and other risks. Commodity prices can be subject to extreme volatility and significant price swings.
TIPS In periods of no or low inflation, other types of bonds, such as US Treasury Bonds, may perform better than Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS).
Investing in technology stocks entails specific risks, including the potential for wide variations in performance and usually wide price swings, up and down. Technology companies can be affected by, among other things, intense competition, government regulation, earnings disappointments, dependency on patent protection and rapid obsolescence of products and services due to technological innovations or changing consumer preferences.
Because of the cyclical nature of natural resource companies, their stock prices and rates of earnings growth may follow an irregular path.
The value approach to investing carries the risk that the market will not recognize a security’s intrinsic value for a long time or that a stock judged to be undervalued may actually be appropriately priced. Growth stocks are subject to the volatility inherent in common stock investing, and their share price may fluctuate more than that of a income-oriented stocks.
Small‑cap stocks have generally been more volatile in price than the large‑cap stocks.
All investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal. Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market. Index performance is for illustrative purposes only and is not indicative of any specific investment. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
Fixed‑income securities are subject to credit risk, liquidity risk, call risk, and interest‑rate risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices generally fall. Investments in high‑yield bonds involve greater risk of price volatility, illiquidity, and default than higher‑rated debt securities. Investments in bank loans may at times become difficult to value and highly illiquid; they are subject to credit risk such as nonpayment of principal or interest, and risks of bankruptcy and insolvency.
T. Rowe Price cautions that economic estimates and forward‑looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, which change over time. Actual outcomes could differ materially from those anticipated in estimates and forward‑looking statements, and future results could differ materially from any historical performance. The information presented herein is shown for illustrative, informational purposes only. Any historical data used as a basis for this analysis are based on information gathered by T. Rowe Price and from third‑party sources and have not been independently verified. Forward‑looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and T. Rowe Price assumes no duty to and does not undertake to update forward‑looking statements.
Additional Disclosures
Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but J.P. Morgan does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. The index is used with permission. The Index may not be copied, used, or distributed without J.P. Morgan’s prior written approval. Copyright © 2025, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.
CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are registered trademarks owned by CFA Institute.
Important Information
This material is being furnished for informational and/or marketing purposes only and does not constitute an offer, recommendation, advice, or solicitation to sell or buy any security.
Prospective investors should seek independent legal, financial and tax advice before making any investment decision. T. Rowe Price group of companies including T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and/or its affiliates receive revenue from T. Rowe Price investment products and services.
Past performance is not a guarantee or a reliable indicator of future results. All investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal.
Information presented has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, however, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness. The views contained herein are those of the author(s), are as of May 31, 2025, are subject to change, and may differ from the views of other T. Rowe Price Group companies and/or associates. Under no circumstances should the material, in whole or in part, be copied or redistributed without consent from T. Rowe Price.
All charts and tables are shown for illustrative purposes only. Actual future outcomes may differ materially from any estimates or forward‑looking statements provided.
The material is not intended for use by persons in jurisdictions which prohibit or restrict the distribution of the material and in certain countries the material is provided upon specific request.
EEA—Unless indicated otherwise this material is issued and approved by T. Rowe Price (Luxembourg) Management S.à r.l. 35 Boulevard du Prince Henri L‑1724 Luxembourg which is authorised and regulated by the Luxembourg Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. For Professional Clients only.
Switzerland—Issued in Switzerland by T. Rowe Price (Switzerland) GmbH, Talstrasse 65, 6th Floor, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland. For Qualified Investors only.
UK—This material is issued and approved by T. Rowe Price International Ltd, Warwick Court, 5 Paternoster Square, London EC4M 7DX which is authorised and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. For Professional Clients only.
© 2025 T. Rowe Price. All Rights Reserved. T. Rowe Price, INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE, the Bighorn Sheep design, and related indicators (troweprice.com/ip) are trademarks of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
202506-4573368